Reforestation

Could it Save Our Planet?
 
 

Fall 2000
Presented by: Brett Vander Velden and Shawn Nauman
52:163 Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics
Department of Chemical & Biochemical Engineering
The University of Iowa







 

Contents

Objective

Background

Biological and Chemical Processes

Rainforest Depletion

Sample Tree Calculations

Quantity of Trees

Size of Useable Areas for Reforestation

Advantages and Disadvantages

Relevance to Kyoto Protocol

Conclusion

References
 


 

Objective

The objective of this project is to look at reforestation as a method that will counter the Earth’s warming and reduce the average global temperature with minimal negative environmental and economical impacts. This can be accomplished by preventing rainforest depletion and reforesting vast areas of land. Trees act as a carbon dioxide sink, thus removing CO2 from the atmosphere. Removing CO2 aids in decreasing the amount of energy absorbed by the atmosphere and will in turn reduce temperatures. The following information has been determined in support of the objective:
 
 

Benefits of preventing rainforest depletion

Effects of CO2 on global warming

Role of  carbon cycle

Method of CO2 uptake by trees

Quantity of trees needed and  size of usable areas for reforestation

Advantages and Disadvantages of the project

Relevance to Kyoto Protocol of reforestation
 
 
 

Back to top

 

Background

Carbon Dioxide as a Greenhouse Gas

The Earth’s atmosphere is unique because it is able to naturally absorb infrared waves directly from the sun and also those that are radiated from the planet’s surface. Gases found in the atmosphere, mainly water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), and methane (CH4), also known as greenhouse gases, are responsible for the absorption thermal energy. Without this effect, the average global temperature would be lower and the heat would bounce off the Earth’s surface, unimpeded into space. Water vapor is the most abundant component of the atmosphere and has a lifetime of approximately eight days. As the atmosphere warms, more water vapor is produced, thus increasing the greenhouse effect. This results in a cyclical ef fect. Carbon dioxide is the second most abundant greenhouse gas. The main contribution of CO2 to the atmosphere by man is the burning of fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide has a lifetime of over one hundred years. This means that the addition of CO2 to the atmosphere has a devastating effect on increased warming.
 
 

Figure 1: Global warming is causing glaciers and icebergs to melt at an extraordinary rate.





Impacts of Increased Global Temperature

The average global temperature has been increasing since the dawn of the idustrial age.  Many scientific models predict an increase of 2-4 degrees Celsius in the next century for a doubled amount of CO2.  In order to maintain balance and achieve a sustainable environment for all life forms, it is necessary to reduce the average global temperature. Increases in the average global temperature result in drastic effects on the environment, including the melting of polar ice caps, glaciers, and icebergs. This causes the ocean levels to rise, forcing coastal populations to move inland. Meteorological impacts include greater occurrences of severe weather, such as tornadoes, hurricanes, and thunderstorms, and shifts in regional climates, which may cause agricultural regions to become less productive.  Pervasiveness of particular diseases is directly related to warm climates. Therefore, as the temperature of areas increase there is a greater threat to human health. The ecosystem is also threatened by the loss of species due to intense changes in habitats.
 

Back to top
 


 

Biological and Chemical Processes 

Carbon dioxide poses an extreme global warming problem in today’s world. Due to the burning of fossil fuels and other various man-made activities, the natural carbon cycle has been disrupted and does not balance. More CO2 is being produced than is being consumed by either plants and animals or the oceans.

Figure 2: A typical schematic of carbon dioxide cycling featuring net production and consumption.

Carbon dioxide is consumed readily by most green plants and the leaves of trees. Trees uptake the CO2 in specific cells called chloroplasts and give off oxygen. These chloroplasts produce energy for the plant and make glucose.  This occurs through a process called photosynthesis.  Normally, the equation for which photosynthesis occurs is as follows:
 
 

CO2 + H2O + sunlight ® glucose + oxygen





This is reversed in the process of respiration, performed by both plants and animals:
 
 


Glucose + oxygen ® CO2 + H2O



.
 
 

 Figure 3: Trees, such as the ones in this rain forest, are responsible for photosynthetic reactions and uptake of CO2.

Trees use more COthrough photosynthesis than they release through respiration.  CO2 that is not used in the photosynthetic process and is not released by respiration is then stored in the cells of the tree. This CO2 is not released again until the tree decomposes or stops growing. As a matter of fact, one growing tree can consume about 50 pounds of CO2 in one year. For every ton of wood grown, trees uptake about 1.5 tons of carbon dioxide and give off a little more than a ton of oxygen for up to about 40 years. For example, one acre of pine will grow about 3 tons of wood and give off 3.2 tons of oxygen. This means that the trees will consume close to 4.4 tons of CO2 in photosynthetic processes and in their cells in a period of only one year! This surprising statistic is even greater for deciduous trees. So, how much of a volume of air do trees effect? Statistically, a forest growing at the rate of 10 m3 of wood per hectare per year is absorbing the CO2 from 14 million m3 of air. Because of these surprising facts, trees increase the rate at which greenhouse gases are removed from the atmosphere.
 
 

These facts sound very pleasing on paper, however trees can also release carbon dioxide and uptake oxygen. This happens most commonly in the decay process. Trees will not experience this type of situation until they are much older, stop growing, or are left to rot. The decay process requires oxygen and gives off relatively high levels of methane. Methane is also a greenhouse gas and absorbs almost 20 times more radiation than does carbon dioxide. Therefore, in order to maintain a proper balance and to reduce global warming, steps should be taken to harvest the trees. This harvesting would ensure a continuous cycle of birth, growth, and death. This would also ensure proper reforestation of harvested lands.

Back to top
 


 

Rainforest Depletion

Approximately one-half of the world’s forests are temperate, and one-half are tropical. While the temperate forests have recently been increasing in size each year, the tropical forests continue to be deforested at an alarming rate. Nearly 214,000 acres (slightly larger than New York City) are destroyed each day resulting in approximately 78 million acres (about the size of Poland) being destroyed each year. Rainforests cover about 2 percent of the earth’s surface. Scientists believe that less than half of the original rainforests currently remain. The following figure shows areas where rainforests currently exist and areas where they once existed.

Figure 4: The area of existing tropical rainforest versus the former area of rainforests reveals approximately a 50 percent reduction.

 Along with being one of the most productive and complex ecosystems, rainforests provide oxygen and absorb carbon dioxide from the atmosphere. The destruction of the rainforests cause several problems that can be linked to global warming. Not only is less CO2 removed from the atmosphere, deforestation results in increased levels of CO2 added to the atmosphere. One of the major reasons for deforestation is to obtain land suitable for cattle ranching. To prepare land for raising cattle, the land is clear cut, the trees are left to dry, and then the wood is burned. This slashing and burning process accounts for 20-25 percent of man-made CO2 emissions. Therefore, in order to reduce the effects of global warming, deforestation must be prevented.


Deforestation hurts our planet.
 
 

Figure 5: Rainforests like this one are being cut down around the world at an alarming rate.






Back to top
 


 

Sample Tree Calculations

Quantity of Trees

In order to determine the quantity of trees needed to lower the carbon dioxide levels to those in 1990, assuming no more emissions are released, the total CO2 removal from the atmosphere must first be calculated. It is estimated that the CO2 concentration has risen from 350ppm to 370ppm.  The CO2 removal is calculated bel ow:
 
 

Step 1. ppm is a volumetric measurement and must be converted to a mass measurement. For CO2 (MW=44) at standard conditions, 1ppm(v/v) is equal to 1.8x10-6 kg/m3. If this number is multiplied by 370ppm, the total CO2 concentration can then be determined to be 6.66x10-4 kg/m3.
 
 

Step 2. Calculate the volume of the atmosphere.  Only the volume of the troposphere is con sidered because that is the only part of the atmosphere that trees can uptake CO2. This can be done by taking the volume of the troposphere and earth, and subtracting the volume of the earth.  The troposphere is estimated to be 10 km high from the earth.  The volume of the earth and troposphere is found by using V = (4/3)pr^3, where r is the radius of the earth plus 10 km.  Then the volume of the earth is found using the same formula.  These volumes are subtracted to give the volume of the troposphere, which is 5.1x1018m3.
 
 

Step 3. Determine the value of the CO2 concentration. Multiplying the total volume of the atmosphere by the total CO2 concentration yields the mass of CO2 in the troposphere. The mass in 2000 is 3.39x1015kg, while the mass in 1990 was 3.213x1015kg. The difference between the two, 1.83x1014kg, is the amount of CO2 that must be removed from the atmosphere to reach 1990 levels.
 
 

Based on the types of trees being used, the number of trees that can be planted per acre can be determined. The average amount of space needed by these types of hardwoods is about 32ft2. Thus, 1,361 trees can be planted on one acre of land. If each tree can remove 50lb of CO2 from the atmosphere each year, then the total amount of CO2 removed by each acre of trees each year is 68,050lb or 30,867kg. If the amount of CO2 calculated is to be removed in 10 years, then the amount of land needed for reforestation would be about 593 milliion acres, or about 1.5 times the size of Alaska. However, there are certain factors that need to be considered when looking at the size of usable areas for reforestation.

Figure 6: In order to reach 1990 levels of CO2, many acres of trees must be planted.

Back to top
 


 

Size of Usable Areas for Reforestation

There are approximately 36.5 billion acres of land on the Earth. However, much of it cannot be used to plant hardwood trees. Several factors must be considered when analyzing how much land can be used for reforesting:
 
 

Growth of trees

Winter months

Human populated areas
 
 

The first factor to consider in determining usable areas for reforestation is what climates maintain the best opportunities for growth of these types of trees. Some of the colder climates, north or south of about 48o latitude, will not support the growth of the recommended hardwood trees. Also, dry, desert-like conditions cannot support the growth of trees. Together, this narrows the available land for reforestation by ~50%.
 
 

Another factor to consider in finding usable areas is the effect of the winter months on CO2 removal by trees. The leaves fall off deciduous trees above and below certain latitudes on the Earth. This would result in less CO2 removal for the trees planted in these regions.  This would narrow the available land for reforestation by another ~20%.
 
 

The third factor in considering the usable areas for reforestation includes analyzing heavily populated areas. Trees cannot be planted in these types of regions throughout the world. However, there are several areas that are open and would support the growth of trees very well. The depleted rainforests are about 2% of the total land area of the Earth. This would be almost 1 billion acres of land to use. Other places conditions would be suitable include Central and South America, the southern United States, southern Asia and the Middle East. It is quite possible that as much as 5 billion acres of land throughout the world could be used to plant trees. If 30,867kg of CO2 are removed from the atmosphere per acre per year, then 5 billion acres would decrease the CO2 concentration by 1.54x1014kg/yr.  When considered in the problem above, although this is highly unfeasible because this would require all suitable available land for reforestation, the 1.83x1014kg of carbon dioxide could be removed in a little over a year!
 


 

Figure 7: Although the earth has roughly 36.5 billion acres of land, only about 5 billion acres could be used for reforestation.





Back to top

 

 

Advantages & Disadvantages

 Advantages Environment

Acceptance

Lumber

Jobs

Plant & Animal Life
 
 

Disadvantages Cost

Time and Land

Forest Fires
 
 

Advantages

Environment


 

The biggest reason for selecting reforestation as a method to cool the planet is due to its positive impact on the planet. Instead of adding aerosols, which decrease the air quality, or blocking out the sun to lower the planetary temperature, a natural progression back to a lower temperature can occur. If reforestation is used as a method to reduce the global temperature, the environment will not be negatively impacted. This is perhaps the most important point of this proposal. By reforesting to reduce the temperature, another pollution problem is not created to solve global warming. This is what makes reforestation a feasible solution to help solve thermal climate change. Trees are also very long lasting as opposed to aerosols, which only last a few months.
 
 

Acceptance


 

The implementation of an environmentally friendly plan to reduce the temperature of the atmosphere, such as reforestation, can be implemented quickly and will most likely be supported by the public. This is because reforestation will not impede on the daily lives of people. People are more likely to back a proposal that does not hinder their life or lifestyle. Reforestation is a perfect example of this. Reforestation will allow most people to go about their daily lives without knowing anything has changed. This is because reforestation is a non-invasive proposal, because it does not require people to give up their way of life. However, legislation will probably also be required to limit carbon dioxide emissions in the future.
 
 

Lumber

A benefit of the reforestation proposal is the production of lumber. After a tree has reached adulthood, it begins to fix less and less carbon dioxide. When the tree has reach maturity (approximately 40 years) they will be cut down and replaced with a new seedling to continue the process. This will create a large surplus of lumber, which can be used for everything from construction materials to paper products. The important point is that trees are a renewable resource unlike fossil fuels or minerals mi ned from the ground. As the world begins to move away from non-renewable resources, lumber could provide a sustainable renewable source for many different applications.
 
 

Jobs

Another benefit of this plan is the creation of many jobs for both skilled and unskilled workers. First of all, the new seedlings will need to be planted. This will require large amounts of unskilled workers from around the world. Skilled workers will also be needed to monitor the growth of the forests and fire personal will have to be available in the event of a forest fire.
 
 

Plant & Animal Life

A final benefit of this proposal is the continuation of biodiversity in the rainforests of the world. With a large number of the world’s organisms living in the rainforest, the halting of further deforestation will promote biodiversity. The protection of the rainforests and the variety of plants and animals that exist within them will allow many different species to flourish and maintain the critical life balance that has allowed the species of this planet to exist and evolve.
 
 

Disadvantages
 
 

Cost


 

Every proposal will possess the negative impact of cost. The process of thermally changing the climate of a planet will always cost money. With reforestation, there will be a high initial cost of raising the seedlings, the planting process, and the acquisition of land. However, eventually the cost can be offset by the production of lumber. This will reduce the recurring costs, which makes this plan feasible. However, with a surplus of lumber available, the cost of lumber will most likely decrease. Therefore, funding will still be necessary after start-up.
 
 

Time and Land

Time and land are both negatives of this proposal, but they are inter-related. As either time or land is decreased, the other increases. For example, if the time needed to reach early 1990 carbon dioxide concentrations were decreased, a drastic increase in the land need would occur. And vice versa, if the amount of land were reduced, the time to reduce the concentration would also increase. To reduce the impact of these two factors, a middle ground must be found. This will depend on the land available for reforestation and the urgency in reduction of the temperature.
 
 

Forest Fires


 

Every year, forest fires destroy thousands of acres of forests in the U.S. alone.  Not only does this decrease the amount of carbon dioxide being taken out of the atmosphere, it also releases all of the CO2 stored in the trees into the atmosphere.  These fires are started by natural causes like lightning, and also by man.  Man-made fires start from cigarettes, campfires left unattended, and occasionally from controlled-burn fires that are set to prevent forest fires, and then they get out of hand.
 
 

Back to top
 


 

Relevance to Kyoto Protocol
 

The Kyoto Protocol is a set of environmental guidelines to reduce the levels of carbon dioxide by reducing carbon dioxide emmissions and to use forests as possible carbon sinks which would include reforestation. Developed countries would be more apt to agree to reforestation being included in the protocol due to their large dependence on fossil fuels, and it would count as a carbon sink under the protocol.  Developing countries may see forests as an asset and stop deforestation because they could utilize forests under the protocol.  Countries with little or unsuitable area for forests may be against this being added to the protocol because they would not benefit from it.
 


Figure 8: The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) developed the Kyoto Protocol.


Back to top
 


 

Conclusion

Global warming has been a rapidly growing problem throughout the world. With the average global temperature continuing to rise, it is evident that something must be done. Worldwide reforestation and prevention of rainforest destruction is a plan that, with time and the help of other CO2 reduction methods, can reverse the global warming process without presenting any additional adverse environmental effects. Rainforest depletion must be stopped and reforestation must begin. With greenhouse gases being emitted at higher and higher rates every year, doing nothing would have adverse effects to life as we know it on Earth. This plan could save our planet.
 
 






Back to top
 


 

References

 Books, Journals and Other Writings:

  • Turco, R.P. 1997. Earth Under Siege: From Air Pollution to Global Change. Oxford University Press, New York.
  • Walsh, Barry W. "World Forests" American Forests, November - December 1989, vol. 95. No. 11&12. P. 31
  • Colliers Encyclopedia, Volume 5. 1990, New York
  • Web Pages:
  • Global Warming http://www.chem.wm.edu/chemWWW/courses/chem105/projects/group1/page8.html
  • Logan, R.H. Effects of CO2 in the Atmosphere http://mot.cprost.sfu.ca/~rhlogan/co2.html
  • Barton, W.J. Telling Our Story http://www.fs.fed.us/eco/eco-watch/ew920108
  • Greenspirit http://www.greenspirit.com/carbon.htm
  • Best Management Practices for Field Production of Nursery Stock: Planting Density http://www.bae.ncsu.edu/programs/extension/ag-env/nursery/plant_density.html
  • Greenpeace Home Page http://www.greenpeace.org
  • Back to top


     
     

    And Remember Kids, This...

    Leads To This.